Arizona Friends of Chamber Music
Commissioning program

The links on the left will take you to an individual composer's AFCM page, where you can listen to our complete premiere performances, review program notes, and find out how our commissions have fared, and learn more about the composers. Unless otherwise noted, audio is from the premiere.

Commissioning program home

Commissioning program description

Lera Auerbach
Sylvie Bodorova
Curt Cacioppo
Dan Coleman
Jeffery Cotton
Richard Danielpour
Ross Edwards
Tania Gabrielle French
Jiri Gemrot
Stephen Gryc
Jennifer Higdon
Lee Hoiby
Katherine Hoover
Anthony Iannaccone
Kamran Ince
Robert Maggio
Dominik Maican
Kelly-Marie Murphy
Stephen Paulus
Raimundo Penaforte
Elizabeth Raum
Augusta Read-Thomas
Fazil Say
Gerard Schurman
Thomas Schuttenhelm
R. Murray Schafer
Ezra Sims
Stephen Stucky
Joan Tower
Dmitri Tymoczko
Reza Vali
Roel van Oosten
Joelle Wallach
Patrick Zimmerli
Ellen Taafe Zwilich

Matthew Snyder,
recording engineer
Video Documentary
of 3 premieres

If needed, download
Adobe Flash player
here

THOMAS SCHUTTENHELM

"Lyric Serenade" for Violin and Bass

Premiered by Joseph Lin (violin) and Volkan Orhon (bass). March 2009.
Commissioned by AFCM.
Sponsored by: Karen Sternal.

Composer's website: http://www.thomasschuttenhelm.com/
Score available for download on website

The composer describes his Lyric Serenade, a five-movement duo for violin and bass: “The title describes its character as being lyric-dramatic, as opposed to develop.m.ental and symphonic. Although there is no specific programmatic narrative to the work, there is a clear dramatic trajectory to the succession of movements. The first and last movements use a deliberately accessible style (groove-based rhythms, regular phrase structure, strong melodic profiles, extended tonalities) to represent an extroverted position. The second and fourth movements represent transition and are more ambivalent in their presentation of material. The second movement reluctantly moves away from the security of the conventions heard in the first movement, and towards a less familiar, but more personal, language of its own. The central movement, marked ‘slow’ and ‘static’ is the most contemplative and introverted of the group. The movement begins quietly and in unison. As the lines move chromatically away from each other, the dissonance creates a ‘beating’ between the notes, which in turn generates motion and an increase in tempo. There are no traditional bar lines in this movement. Instead the instrumentalists must create lines and ‘events’ (chords and harmonies). Eventually what emerges is a progression, not unlike that of a chorale, but in a decidedly modern language. The fourth movement is again one of transition, moving tentatively out from the introspective center while making an attempt to regain its momentum. The last movement re-establishes the confidence represented by a comparatively accessible style, but with an added element of complexity in its construction. Here accessibility masks a deeper complexity so it appears on first experience as remarkably similar in character, if not in language, to the first movement. But a closer listening will reveal some of the most highly nuanced music of the entire suite. One might detect a symmetrical pattern to the design, and in its crudest form the movements do reflect an ABCBA configuration. Rather than being a return, the latter B and A (movements 4 and 5) continue the progression of ideas that are part of the larger musical argument.